Downscaled Australian climate data turned into quantified financial impact for every asset you own, with every assumption on the table.
AASB S2 wants quantified financial impacts. Your current climate risk work is a qualitative heatmap from a 2022 TCFD report.
Your assets sit across multiple hazard regions and the board wants to know which sites carry the exposure, and what it costs.
A consultant quoted six figures for scenario analysis you'll need to repeat every reporting cycle.
Each site with its value, downtime cost and operating assumptions, all yours to control and override. Portfolio-scale onboarding from a spreadsheet.
Physical hazards on CMIP6 downscaled projections (NARCliM regional downscaling where coverage applies) across SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 pathways; transition risk on NGFS scenarios (Net Zero 2050, Delayed Transition) generated live from the regulatory graph. Hazard probabilities by horizon: 2030, 2040, 2050.
Expected Annual Loss and NPV per hazard, per asset, with every assumption, sensitivity and discount rate laid out. No black box: the methodology is published and peer-reviewed.
Load planned capex, such as a cooling upgrade or a flood levee, and watch it bend the risk curve before you commit. Inherent, current and residual scores, with residual computed from linked actions in the tracker.
Results land in the AASB S2 strategy pillar as auditable scenario analysis, repeatable every cycle instead of a one-off project. Full provenance on every number: derived, overridden or user-assessed.
Published with QUT and the Asset Institute (Springer), so the financial modelling survives assurance scrutiny. Download the paper (PDF)
Physical and transition risk in a single risk register with full version history instead of two disconnected spreadsheets.
Transition scenarios are fed by the live regulatory graph, so policy-driven risk reflects what regulators are doing now rather than a static scenario library.
Climate risk and scenario analysis delivered across QLD and NSW agricultural operations and a national food services business, using a methodology published in a peer-reviewed journal.